I had the opportunity to speak on a panel a few nights ago hosted by Eyal Bino ICONYC labs on the State of NYC Tech in 2018. This couldn’t have been more timely as Amazon officially announced its HQ2 which included a location in Long Island City/NYC (see Steve Lohr article on NYC tech). Right off the bat, our moderator Hope King from Cheddar asked whether or not there were any negative reactions to the announcement.
So I chimed in…Yes, it’s going to suck for startups over the next few years as they compete for tech talent with Amazon and also Google who announced they were doubling their NYC presence with another 7k hires to 14k employees.
Andrew Cleland agreed but long term believed it would be a net add as new talent will move to NYC and would also provide a landing spot between startups to take a breather before doing it again.
Ellie Wheeler had some great points as well and mentioned that this solidifies NYC as a clear tech hub and brings even more credibility to our strong ecosystem.
Why Every NYC startup should build a HQ2
So this got me thinking. I was just in San Fran for a board meeting 2 weeks ago for one of our portfolio companies which raised a sizable Series A round and was in the process expanding from 7–30 people over the next year. While discussing our need for a VP Engineering candidate, we all agreed that one of the most important criteria was experience managing a remote team. This is not the old days of outsourcing engineering but more about building another engineering function as part of your core team or in Amazon’s parlance, a HQ2. This is a conversation I’ve repeatedly had with boldstart founders on the west coast and one that will continue indefinitely in the future. My strong belief is that startups who build this capability early on will have a competitive advantage for the long term as companies in Silicon Valley have a hard time scaling talent after Series B rounds. This same capability also has to be addressed in NYC and NOW as Amazon and Google expand their presence and price out startups for talent.
Security Scorecard (portfolio co) is based in NYC and scaling and has some of its engineering team in Latin America and Prague. BigID (portfolio co) is in NYC and Israel. Our last two investments were made in Canadian companies with fully remote engineering teams. In fact, we’ve made 9 investments in Canadian startups since 2010. Yes, once upon a time most VCs would run for the hills with fully remote teams but in the world of Github, open source, and a need for amazing talent, this can be a huge competitive advantage…if done correctly.
Cool examples of this include Stack Overflow in NYC (see post from 2013) who manage their stand-up meetings so that even if the bulk of the team is in the office, they go back to their desks to do their video stand-up so no one feels left out.
Snyk (portfolio co) who has a team in London and Israel brings the whole company together in either location at least twice a year.
Front(portfolio co) has a team with two headquarters in SF (CEO/GTM) and Paris (Engineering)?—?more on their European HQ here.
GitLab (see recent article from Inc) and Automattic (see Quartz article from May 2018) have fully distributed teams and have scaled successfully.
VP Eng Gary Poster from Manifold (portfolio co) used to manage a fully remote team at Heroku and has laid out some best practices and a whole series on how he manages and structures his team?—?see here.
The bottom line?—?amazing engineers can be found anywhere, technology like Slack and Zoom and Github continue to bring down the barriers of being in person, and ultimately rather than being a negative, having a HQ2 to scale or having a fully remote engineering team is and will be a major competitive advantage for startups. I am pumped about the future of NYC but the world also has amazing talent and the sooner you can build out those capabilities the better off you will be.